moved Amendment No. 186:"Page 74, line 18, at end insert ““, however, an omission from, or mistake in, such a notice will not render the notice ineffective, provided such omission or mistake is not material””"
The noble Lord said: In moving Amendment No. 186 I shall speak also to Amendments Nos. 188 and 191. Amendment No. 186 seeks to ensure that minor omissions or mistakes do not render a general notice invalid, giving rise to a technical breach of the disclosure obligation. It seeks guidance and an explanation of whether a minor omission could invalidate the process. The purpose of Amendment No. 188 again seeks to clarify that a minor oversight cannot be used to invalidate the members’ approval of directors’ long-term service contracts if the procedures for obtaining members’ approval are otherwise adhered to. Last, Amendment No. 191 is designed to provide protection where a company falls short of strict adherence to the procedures in Clause 180 by accidental omission rather than deliberate intention. The amendments seek to ensure that draconian measures are not invoked unnecessarily. I beg to move.
Company Law Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Freeman
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c341-2GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:46:23 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299584
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299584
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299584