So far as current law is concerned, as my noble friend will recall, we are seeking to replace the general duties in the current law with a statement of what in many instances is a codification of the current law and in others makes some change to it. The purpose of subsection (4) is to make it clear, as it says, that the duty not to accept benefits from third parties will not be infringed if the benefit cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest. I paraphrase; it is the statute that matters, not my words.
I was about to conclude my sentence by saying that I will write to the noble Lord and to other noble Lords who have participated in Committee today and put a copy of the letter in the Library, rather than giving an answer straight off.
Company Law Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Goldsmith
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c331GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:23:54 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299552
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299552
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299552