I am grateful for that explanation. This side of the Committee is clear that we want an efficient capital market to operate. That requires openness and minimal obligations, without anything that cannot be justified as being necessary to protect shareholders and to ensure that business is conducted transparently and efficiently. The Attorney-General has probably steered a careful course between openness and imposing obligations. I note what he says about Clause 389(4)—that it provides for subsequent regulation. Those who have made representations to this side will wish to read the record and perhaps reach a considered judgment in due course. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Company Law Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Freeman
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c326-7GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:31:38 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299539
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299539
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299539