Why was that not done before? In the last piece of legislation, a date was named, which was obviously cancelled in the end. We support this part of legislation cancelling the revaluation because it is obviously necessary.
Why do these pieces of legislation have to be in the Bill now? Why can we not all wait for Sir Michael Lyons’s report before we continue? There will probably have to be legislation to implement the recommendations of Sir Michael’s report, so why can we not have a short Bill cancelling the current revaluation and leave the rest until we are ready for it? We do not understand that. There are few amendments on the Bill but they all question why the Government are doing this now rather than waiting for Sir Michael Lyons’s report.
Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hanningfield
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c300GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:44:33 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_298347
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_298347
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_298347