I shall be very brief because I think the Minister has answered the issue we wished to raise in relation to the series of technical amendments to which he has just spoken.
A great deal of legal drafting is expended on Clause 120 and the single-member company. The issue of why such companies should be treated differently from other companies has been raised with us and, in particular, why it is necessary to produce a statement. If you have a one-member company it becomes pretty clear when it is altering its status because you have one member. I suspect the Minister will tell me that this is to do with the EU directive, but it seems to be taking a sledgehammer to crack a rather small nut. We have therefore initiated this stand part debate to get on the record the Government’s views on the value of this extremely lengthy clause on a series of events which seem self-evident.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c153GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:24:14 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296742
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296742
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296742