My name is on these three amendments and I support the noble Baroness. Our view is that it would be better to define ““improper”” and to tackle the issue that way round. Some of these issues came up in discussions on the Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill, including confidentiality and the position of shareholders.
I hope the Minister will mention in his remarks how this will wash-over or impact on the register of members kept at Companies House. Presumably a perfect way for people to get around this obstacle—for good or bad purpose—is to apply to Companies House for the register of members that is available there. If an improper purpose was found, how would that be dealt with in relation to access to Companies House records, which could provide a loophole for people who had malice aforethought? I very much support the thrust of the noble Baroness’s remarks.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c149-50GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:24:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296731
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296731
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296731