moved Amendment No. 114:"Page 50, line 34, leave out subsection (4)."
The noble Lord said: This is a probing amendment. It concerns subsection (4) of Clause 113, on the register of members. It raises two issues. The first is to question the Minister about the meaning of the word ““member””. My understanding was that only a shareholder could be classed as a member of a company and that stockholders were not classed as members. However, Clause 113(4) seems to suggest that a stockholder is classed as a member and would, therefore, be entitled to all members’ rights. I hope that the Minister can give some guidance in this area. It may be that my precise knowledge of the definition of the word ““stock”” is faulty.
The second point is to consider the implications for convertible stock, as that is a form of security—at least in my experience when the word ““stock”” is now used most frequently. We attempted to track this through the Companies Act 1985 without much success. Therefore, I hope that the huge resources available to the Minister will be able to provide us with enlightenment tonight. I beg to move.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c146GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:39:11 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296722
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296722
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296722