This clause requires members of a company to give their assent before a company re-registers as unlimited. It makes specific provision for situations where a member has died or become bankrupt but not where a member has become mentally incapable. I am very grateful for the noble Lord’s suggestion that we should add the Master of the Court of Protection to the clause, thus making some explicit provision in the latter case. However, I am not persuaded that that is necessary.
There is a fundamental difference between, on the one hand, death and bankruptcy, which change ownership, and, on the other, incapacity, which does not. In the latter case, someone is appointed to act on behalf of the person who is incapable. In making a distinction between these cases, the Bill reflects the position not only under previous Companies Acts but also, I understand, under other not dissimilar legislation, and I do not think it would be helpful to make a change here. The important point is that people who are incapacitated should have opportunities for shares to be voted so that, if necessary, all the members can participate.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c141-2GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:24:05 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296706
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296706
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296706