moved Amendment No. 106:"Page 45, line 20, after ““of”” insert ““or the Master of the Court of Protection acting for””"
The noble Lord said: Subsection (4) makes allowance for companies to act in situations where a member of the company is bankrupt or deceased. That is obviously important. However, it makes no provision for someone of unsound mind. The amendment seeks to rectify the omission by allowing the Master of the Court of Protection, acting for a member of the company, to assent to a company becoming unlimited. I can see no reason why provision should not be made for that eventuality. It would require a consequential amendment to Clause 108, but this afternoon we thought that we would confine ourselves to an ““in principle”” discussion to get the Government’s views first. I beg to move.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c141GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:28:04 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296705
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296705
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296705