moved Amendment No. 105:"Page 45, line 11, leave out subsection (2)."
The noble Lord said: We are moving through Part 7, which deals with re-registration. Here we come to the re-registration of private limited companies as unlimited. Clause 102(2) prohibits a company re-registering as an unlimited company if it has previously been a limited company, having previously been unlimited, or, an unlimited company, having previously been limited. We do not see the purpose behind this prohibition. Why should companies not be able to register as unlimited in such situations? There do not seem to be any good reasons why a company cannot change its status more than once. We are for achieving and maintaining maximum flexibility. This amendment removes the prohibition and enhances flexibility. I beg to move.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c140GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:01:56 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296702
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296702
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296702