Again, the hon. Gentleman will have his own opinions, but the concept of ““threatening, abusive and insulting”” is understood and interpreted by the courts. It would be bizarre in the extreme if for this offence, and this offence only, we referred only to threatening behaviour and did not use the words ““abusive and insulting””. What would the courts make of that in relation to this legislation and, I might say, all other public order legislation?
Racial and Religious Hatred Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Paul Goggins
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 31 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Racial and Religious Hatred Bill 2005-06.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
442 c202 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:06:19 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296149
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296149
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296149