If I may. I am grateful to the noble Baroness. To be clear, I will go back to the PMG’s Statement. From that it is absolutely clear that the Government were targeting complex and contrived arrangements that could never have any purpose other than avoidance. Should the Treasury seek to change its mind on previously sanctioned schemes, it would have to justify proportionality in legislating retrospectively. Of course there would be human rights implications. This issue of ““at the whim of the Treasury”” is overstated.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c403GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:27:33 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295020
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295020
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295020