We have triggered a rather interesting little debate. I thank all those who have contributed. In particular, I draw the Minister’s attention to the argument put by the noble Viscount, Lord Bledisloe, which is very involved.
It is interesting how wording, as always, can be interpreted in different ways. The Minister tried to suggest that the wording we had put down was somehow going to weaken the Government’s position towards sustainable development, whereas our intention was to strengthen the commitment of Natural England towards sustainable development. Given the complications that have arisen, and in the hope that the Government will look at some of these things in a little more detail, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Duke of Montrose
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 January 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c1122 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 18:29:02 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294270
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294270
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294270