The Minister still refuses to accept that we need the principle to be on the face of the Bill, but we have experienced problems with previous lottery Bills. In discussions on them, hon. Members referred to concern about additionality. Prime Ministers and Leaders of the Opposition assured us that they would not raid lottery funds, yet they did so. It is therefore crucial to include the principle on the face of the Bill.
We have made enormous progress towards what I want to achieve. However, the Minister said that additionality issues ““may”” be reported in the annual report, not that they would be. More important, he has not acceded to his desire to include something about the matter on the face of the Bill.
It is therefore with deep regret, given our progress, that I press new clause 1 to a vote.
Question put, That the clause be read a Second time:—
The House divided: Ayes 179, Noes 271.
National Lottery Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Foster of Bath
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Lottery Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
441 c1014-5 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:11:03 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292779
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292779
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292779