Am I right in thinking that the draft code just circulated by the noble Baroness is applicable to the clause we are now discussing? If it is, parts of it may assuage some of the anxieties just expressed by the noble Viscount, Lord Bridgeman. I am thinking in particular of paragraph 8 on page 9, where the employer does have a right of objection because the level of the penalty is too high. The Secretary of State is obliged to consider evidence provided of the employer’s financial circumstances in determining the objection. If that means that the fine imposed should not be such as to jeopardise the continuing existence of the business, perhaps it will achieve a part of what the noble Viscount seeks in some of his amendments. I hope that the noble Baroness can assure us that what is set out in the code will apply to the interpretation of Clause 16.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Avebury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c127GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:26:58 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290355
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290355
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290355