Yes, I completely confirm that point. Experience has shown just how right that point is.
I see no need to introduce new rigidly specified reporting requirements, even though the future arrangements have not yet been decided. For those reasons I hope the noble Lord will be able to withdraw his first two amendments, and that the House will feel satisfied that the reporting arrangements I have described, and the rights of the House to debate the reports that materialise, will give precisely the kind of reassurance that noble Lords have understandably sought. In that light I ask the noble Lord to consider withdrawing the amendments.
European Union (Accessions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Triesman
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 January 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on European Union (Accessions) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c153 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:37:20 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_289868
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_289868
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_289868