I should like to add one point to what has been said so powerfully by many Members of the Committee. I support the amendments fervently. I refer to the visa queue times. Although I have read and reread it in the Immigration Advisory Service briefing, I simply could not believe that there are three countries where you have to wait three months to get into a queue. Most of us are used to going to India House and complaining that we have to wait 48 hours. But if you are a student and you have been refused or an overstayer, it is no good, as the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, said earlier, saying you have to go back to the beginning, because the whole opportunity of higher education is lost when one of these decisions is made. The case for looking again at the training of ECOs is overwhelming.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Sandwich
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c57GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:16:59 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_289462
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_289462
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_289462