UK Parliament / Open data

London Olympics Bill

Proceeding contribution from Richard Caborn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 6 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bills on London Olympics Bill 2005-06.
This group of Government amendments addresses a very constructive point made by the hon. Member for Bath (Mr. Foster) in Committee and a smaller drafting point that we noticed afterwards. We are very magnanimous this evening, if I may say so. Amendments Nos. 25 and 26 are necessary to allow the commencement of clause 37 on Royal Assent. Clause 37 applies the provisions of the Bill as appropriate to Northern Ireland. Thus clause 37 on Northern Ireland will be brought into line with clause 36 on Scotland, which will commence on Royal Assent. Amendment No. 16 follows the suggestion made by the Liberal Democrats in Committee that the short title should include a specific reference to the Paralympic games. I indicated in Committee that I agreed with that principle, as a central part of our bid was that the London Olympics would be an inclusive games. As many hon. Members know, London staged the first Paralympics in 1948, and we want to ensure that the 2012 Paralympics are the best so far. I could not accept the amendment tabled by the Liberal Democrats in Committee because it was important to get the IOC’s view on the exact wording—[Interruption.] I hear laughter from the hon. Member for Bath. I promised to consider the issue and my officials have been in touch with the IOC. The result is the proposed amendment to make the short title the ““London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill””.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c818 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top