I understand my right hon. Friend’s point, but if one considers, for example, the experience in Wales, revaluation has been relatively unpopular. If one could guarantee that the bulk of the people in a growth area would be pleased to be revalued, his argument would carry more weight. However, I believe that they would be happy to be revalued in isolation when people who lived nearby did not have to accept the additional houses and the attendant pressures or revaluation. I hope that I can deal with that matter in more detail if I am lucky enough to catch your eye on Third Reading, Madam Deputy Speaker. I understand the constraints on the current debate.
The overall problem is with the inequitable nature of the funding formula whereby so much local government money derives from the Treasury. I shall not go further but changing the formula and making it more equitable, not accepting the amendment, is the way to deal with that.
Does my hon. Friend the Member for Northampton, South want to intervene now?
Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Francois
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 1 December 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c427-8 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 11:44:54 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282482
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282482
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282482