I refer my hon. Friend back to what he said about the phrase"““a group of adjoining billing authorities””"
in amendment No. 3. Is not the word ““adjoining”” redundant? If the amendment referred simply to a ““group of billing authorities””, it could cover a group of adjoining authorities, if necessary, and, as my right hon. Friend the Member for East Yorkshire (Mr. Knight) suggested, a group of authorities that, by virtue of the fluctuation of the country’s real estate values, found themselves in the same position regarding the movement of average values, and should thus be grouped for the purpose of a special revaluation? Would it not be helpful for the purposes of the amendment if—
Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Stamford
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 1 December 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c412 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 11:45:47 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282391
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282391
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282391