The hon. Gentleman has made his point. If he will forgive me, I shall not respond to it in detail because there is not enough time.
If the Government are serious about stopping people smoking, which I do not doubt, and if smoking is so bad for us, which I do not doubt either, why do they not ban smoking altogether? There is a one-word answer: tax. We have heard from a number of Members how much smokers cost the national health service. By means of a parliamentary question, I established that not much research is done on whether those admitted to hospital are smokers. Let us, however, accept what the Minister told me in a separate answer—that the estimated cost of smoking-related diseases to the NHS is £1.8 billion a year. That is a lot of money, but we should also bear in mind that smokers put £8.1 billion a year into the Exchequer—more than four times as much. That is why I cannot see the Bill as anything other than a load of confusion, and rather hypocritical.
Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Laurence Robertson
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 29 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Health Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c226-7 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 00:17:04 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281407
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281407
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281407