I may be missing a point here, but I believe our Amendment No. 27 attempts to address this in a slightly different way. Since we are in Committee, I hope that the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, will forgive me if I ask for a point of clarification. Are we absolutely clear that what is intended in the amendment is that payments should be allocated to the lowest rather than the highest interest-bearing balances? As I understand it, that seems to be unnecessarily hard on the borrower, especially for a Liberal Democrat amendment.
Consumer Credit Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord De Mauley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Consumer Credit Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c148-9GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:34:58 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280776
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280776
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280776