My Lords, if that is the case, there may not be a fair pro quo; that is what I am trying to suggest. I do not expect the Minister to tell me today, but if he could write and confirm that and perhaps to give examples of how the costing goes overseas compared with how our costing has gone in this country, with regard to what we are talking about, that would be enormously helpful. I am sure that the BVA and the RCVS would be pleased to have it.
The Minister also said that not many veterinary practices shop around. I am not a veterinary practising person, but I am surprised, as I would have thought that they did shop around and try to get good prices for the products that they use—but I shall not take him to task on that. However, tempted though I am, bearing in mind the time, I must thank all noble Lords who have taken part in today’s important debate. It reflects the intricacies between the various aspects of providing important healthcare for animals, and also that I still believe there is a slight jeopardy of some of those standards slipping because of the steps that have been taken with these statutory instruments. I thank both the Ministers who responded today, and beg leave to withdraw the Motion.
Motion, by leave, withdrawn.
Supply of Relevant Veterinary Medicinal Products Order 2005
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Byford
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2005.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Supply of Relevant Veterinary Medicinal Products Order 2005.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1372 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 18:11:46 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277329
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277329
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277329