Commons Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 216:"Page 21, line 41, after ““case,”” insert ““except that covered in paragraph (b),””" The noble Duke said: This is a probing amendment. Is it the Government’s intention that a court may make a removal and restoration order even in a case where the consent is in order but its terms have not been totally met? That would seem to contradict the spirit of paragraph (b), which implies that non-compliance with specific terms and conditions is open to correction rather than destruction. I beg to move.