I was about to come to my hon. Friend’s question, so now is definitely the time to deal with it. When making a judgment, my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary will of course look at all the evidence, and I find it highly unlikely that a record company would be considered worthy of proscription in the way that my hon. Friend the Member for Wolverhampton, South-West described.
My hon. Friend, and several other right hon. and hon. Members, have referred to matters of history. I invite them to read paragraphs (a) and (b) of suggested new subsection (5B) of section 3 of the 2000 Act, which makes it clear that we are talking about"““conduct that should be emulated in existing circumstances””."
Terrorism Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Paul Goggins
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 3 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Terrorism Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
438 c993 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:45:11 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275330
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275330
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275330