UK Parliament / Open data

Terrorism Bill

Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 3 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bills and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Terrorism Bill.
I have reservations about the wording of clause 21, and much sympathy with what has been said already in that connection. I hope that my hon. Friend the Minister will be able to assure me later that I have misread the clause, but my interpretation is that, for example, a UK citizen singing rebel songs with the Clancy Brothers in a New York bar could be arrested on returning to this country. Furthermore, my reading of the clause suggests that a record company distributing records by groups such as the Clancy Brothers could become a proscribed organisation. In the same way, the distributors of Neil Jordan’s film ““Michael Collins””, which came out five or six years ago and which I suspect most hon. Members will have seen, could become a proscribed organisation in the UK. That is because it could be reasonably expected that some people living in Ireland’s 32 counties might start emulating the activities with which Michael Collins was associated in the period between 1919 and 1921. Those activities included blowing up British forces and, on occasion and by accident, civilians. Under the terms of clause 21, could film distributors also become proscribed organisations?
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
438 c989 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top