UK Parliament / Open data

Terrorism Bill

I agree entirely with the hon. Gentleman’s line of thought, and I remind the Committee that if the recklessness test were included, there is a body of law to explain precisely where we stand on recklessness, thereby making the clause quite simple to operate. Why are the Government including such a nebulous clause, whereby the offence could border on negligence, when the recklessness test could be imposed, as it is for many other offences on the statute book?
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
438 c837 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top