It is true that a certain amount of socialism has been inflicted on Wales, but possibly not in the extreme form that Romania experienced.
Of all the European nations in the 20th century, Romania may have been the unluckiest. The century started with a period of civil unrest and ended with the impoverished legacy of Ceausescu’s bloody rule. In the interim there was the division of the country by the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, followed by several decades under communism, and the more extreme form of communism exemplified by President Ceausescu. It is a credit to the people of Romania that despite their travails throughout the last century, they remain optimistic about their future and want to play their part as a western nation.
It is particularly to the credit of the Romanian people that they look beyond the confines of the EU and have recently become full members of NATO. The hon. Member for Linlithgow and East Falkirk (Michael Connarty) expressed some concern about the presence of the Americans in Romania. I remind him that the Americans are also members of NATO. I believe that there is a delegation from America in Romania at present, looking to establish a NATO base near the Black sea.
There are admittedly real concerns overshadowing the proposed accession of Romania, especially with regard to the development of the economy, public health and corruption. For that reason a safeguard mechanism has been built into the treaty of accession. However, having spoken recently to Romanians, I know that there is great concern in Romania that the mechanism may be invoked to delay the country’s accession by 12 months to 2008. I, for one, hope that that can be avoided.
Over the past 12 months, particularly since last December’s elections, democracy in Romania has made significant strides forward. There is genuine enthusiasm for membership of the EU, which has complemented other political changes in the country. If the process of accession is delayed by 12 months, which may be the case under the terms of the safeguard mechanism, the political impetus that Romania has enjoyed over the past few months may be lost. I would be reluctant for anything to damage the enthusiasm that has built up over recent history in Romania.
Clearly, there are significant problems of corruption, which the Romanian authorities need to address, and under President Basescu they are doing so. It was pointed out by the hon. Member for North Antrim (Rev. Ian Paisley) that those who take a more jaundiced view of the European project would regard it as ironic that an institution whose Court of Auditors has repeatedly for the past 10 years refused to sign off the annual accounts is so picky about corruption in Romania.
The enlargement of the EU to encompass Romania and Bulgaria should be welcomed. It amounts to a widening of Europe, rather than the deepening that was so decisively rejected by France and Holland earlier this year. It sends out a message that Romania and Bulgaria are part of the European family, and that the EU is moving towards the outward-looking association of nation states, which is as it should be. If the EU had been more outward looking over the past 15 years, the accession of Romania and other eastern European nations may have been accelerated.
The presence of Romania and Bulgaria within the body of NATO must also be welcome. Our security as a continent and our relative peace over the past half-century are attributable not only to the European Union, but to the strong and effective Atlantic alliance. NATO and the EU are not mutually exclusive organisations, as they are seen to be by some on the continent. European nations should play their part in wider international arrangements; they should not simply be subsumed into the rigid corpus of a European state.
In short, progress has already been made in Romania. Certainly, much more progress has to be made, but I am sure that the character of the Romanian people, which many speakers have touched on this afternoon, will prevail. The Romanians will play their full role as part of a Europe of independent nation states and as part of the stabilising political force of NATO. I welcome the Bill.
European Union (Accessions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Jones
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on European Union (Accessions) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
438 c781-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 21:28:04 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_273075
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_273075
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_273075