I am grateful to the Secretary of State for taking another intervention—it will be quick. He really needs to clarify the inconsistency of his approach in recent weeks. We are being asked to approve terrorism legislation that will extend part VII for at least two years, and perhaps another year on top of that, on the basis that the security situation, as determined at the present time, makes the provisions ““necessary””. How can he reconcile a Bill that we are being asked to pass on that assessment with the facts that he has already indicated that Sinn Fein’s allowances will be returned in the Assembly, that he will recommend in a few weeks that Sinn Fein Members’ allowances in this House should be returned, and that Royal Irish Regiment home battalions should be disbanded? Before we go any further, will he reconcile the two irreconcilable points of view that are coming out of the Northern Ireland Office?
Terrorism (Northern Ireland) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lady Hermon
(Ulster Unionist Party)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 31 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Terrorism (Northern Ireland) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
438 c629-30 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 21:08:25 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271595
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271595
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271595