I understand why the Paymaster General makes that point, but institutionalising retrospection and raising the possibility that a business or person might have to make retrospective payments to HMRC—only for more legislation to be introduced when it is decided that the rules must be changed—is most regrettable.
The most important thing is certainty. The problem with the Bill is that it will not bring certainty to the tax regime.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Andrew Pelling
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 27 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
438 c490 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:59:32 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270660
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270660
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270660