I am intrigued by the tense the Paymaster General uses. She refers to legislation that the House ““has passed””. Our concern is not with legislation where there is a clear intention from the Government. The issue here is retrospection. That is our great anxiety. Where legislation has been passed, and there is clarity and certainty, that is fine, but the point of the Bill is to sweep back as far as 2 December 2004.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Field
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 27 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
438 c478 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:59:56 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270636
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270636
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270636