First, does the hon. Gentleman agree that if the legislation’s effect is to deter people from even bothering to devise schemes that seek not to pay the tax and national insurance that should have been paid—I sincerely hope it is—it will have done precisely what it aims to do, and all the things he is talking about, which no doubt we will explore in Committee, will not happen?
Secondly, does the hon. Gentleman think that the general taxpayer, and the Government representing the general taxpayer, are also entitled to certainty about revenues? This is employment pay, so it should be subject to pay-as-you-earn and national insurance.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Primarolo
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 27 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
438 c477 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:59:56 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270633
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270633
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270633