The Paymaster General has made a good case for dealing with some contrived schemes that operated for over a decade, but I suspect that the previous Government closed them all down. However, given the complexity of the tax system, which creates an obvious incentive in a grey area to characterise what might have been described as income in the past as capital because of the lower tax rates, how many of the 100 schemes that were being marketed on 2 December 2004 are straightforward rather than the extreme contrivances that we all agree should have been closed down?
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Field
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 27 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
438 c472 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 00:21:22 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270628
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270628
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270628