Commons Bill [HL]

I am sorry not to let my noble friend off the hook, but the 1965 register is where I come from; that is, by names and not by tenement. The whole clause presupposes that the register will be by tenement and not by names. After discussion with officials, I have reached the conclusion that even if my name or others on the 1965 register remain, that will be approved on the new register. Is that correct? If it is, the whole question of severance on rights attaching to land—dominant tenement—falls down in the case of people who have rights registered in their own name.