I will have to give some thought to the specific example the noble Lord gives. Some immediate responses occur to me. Sometimes trade secrets are acquired by an employee or someone else who may be abusing his position, although that may well not be a helpful response to that example. I need to give some consideration to what the existing other protection is.
I began my response to the amendment by making a point about the desirability of keeping the law of fraud and the law of theft aligned on this topic. That may remain an important consideration. That said, I understand the importance of ensuring that people in certain circumstances are protected, perhaps by the criminal law as well as they would be by the civil law. However, I cannot give a better answer to how one would deal with that specific example without some further consideration, which I will give to it after today.
Fraud Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Goldsmith
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Fraud Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c1436 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:25:10 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263146
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263146
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263146