I entirely agree with what the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd, has said, except that it argues the other way. The difficulty is that when you start to put in further words which qualify dishonesty, or which give the impression that if you knew something might be misleading it would then lead back to your state of mind and the question of whether you were acting dishonestly, you are, in a sense, putting an unnecessary danger for a defendant.
Fraud Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lyell of Markyate
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Fraud Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c1421 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:25:05 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263116
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263116
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263116