I am sorry that the noble and learned Lord the former Attorney-General should advance that argument. As a mere solicitor—or former solicitor—I believe that the qualifying words of paragraph (b) are essential. I can see nothing wrong with what is being proposed.
Fraud Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Clinton-Davis
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Fraud Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c1420-1
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:25:06 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263114
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263114
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263114