I realise that the Minister is working his way through the argument, but I simply do not understand that it is simpler for the lay man to wade through six pages of schedules with three columns in them than to give the lay man, trustee or charity a general right of appeal against the decision, direction or order emanating from the Charity Commission. How can it be simpler? Seriously, that is counterintuitiveāit is counter to common sense.
Charities Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Phillips of Sudbury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Charities Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c227 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-10 14:35:35 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260560
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260560
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260560