I support the noble Lord, Lord Swinfen, in his Amendment No. 18. In his generous and helpful letter, the noble Lord, Lord Bassam, explained his reasoning, and that of the Government, in including ““proportionate”” but not ““fair and reasonable””. His main argument was that if the words were included in the Bill it would seem that we were trying to criticise the commission and its past behaviour. The noble Lord, Lord Swinfen, has done so and has given evidence for what he has said.
Even apart from such criticism, however, I argue that the Bill is not written to please the Charity Commission—or any other authority, for that matter. That is not the Bill’s purpose. It is written, if anything, to encourage charities—large and, above all, small. If there is the slightest reason to believe that charities would be encouraged by including the words ““fair and reasonable”” in the Bill, it is a good enough reason to do so. I therefore hope that it is still possible to include these words.
Charities Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Dahrendorf
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Charities Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c187 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-10 14:35:44 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260511
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260511
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260511