My Lords, I had originally proposed to oppose this amendment, because it seemed to me that putting ““and increase”” in line 4 was a potential increase in the regulatory burden. Indeed, I had been trying to persuade the Government, under new Section 1B(3)1—"““The public confidence objective is to increase public trust””—"
to remove ““increase”” and put ““maintain””. I failed to achieve that earlier in Committee. I could hardly support the idea of increasing the effective use of regulatory burden implied thereby.
If we are trying to find ways to increase the quantum of charitable resources by moving ““and increase”” to line 5, however, that seems to me to be a thoroughly praiseworthy objective. I am happy to support the amendment.
Charities Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Charities Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c178-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-10 14:36:00 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260495
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260495
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260495