UK Parliament / Open data

Charities Bill [HL]

If the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Wedderburn, had included a substitution of the word ““review”” for ““revise””, I would have found it tolerable. However, on the principle of, ““if it ain’t broke don’t fix it””, it would be perverse for us to insist that the Charity Commission from time to time ““must”” revise its guidance if the guidance that it inherited is perfectly satisfactory.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c159-60 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top