If the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Wedderburn, had included a substitution of the word ““review”” for ““revise””, I would have found it tolerable. However, on the principle of, ““if it ain’t broke don’t fix it””, it would be perverse for us to insist that the Charity Commission from time to time ““must”” revise its guidance if the guidance that it inherited is perfectly satisfactory.
Charities Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Charities Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c159-60 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-10 14:36:04 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260460
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260460
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260460