The noble Lord said that what the noble and gallant Lord wants could happen anyway under Clause 2(2)(l). Looking down the sweeping list of advancements which can be considered ““charities””, may I suggest that the advancement of peace would be consistent? Why does not the Minister simply include that if he is to continue doggedly defending the Government’s position on such a small matter?
Charities Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Carnegy of Lour
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Charities Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c137
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-10 14:35:52 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260405
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260405
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260405