UK Parliament / Open data

Consumer Credit Bill

Proceeding contribution from Austin Mitchell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bills on Consumer Credit Bill.
By expanding my hon. Friend’s point, I think that the argument will be elucidated. There is a further problem, in that the ombudsman does not rule on price—in other words, on interest rates. That is clearly central to the problem of unfairness. The ombudsman would have to be given powers in that area. The fairness doctrine improves matters, in that it creates a fear in large organisations that they will be taken to court and that something can be ruled unfair. That is especially important for credit card consumers who often face what I regard as unfair and heavy charges for late payment, or for exceeding a credit limit. Such charges build up. A fear will be instilled in credit companies that they might be taken to court and that they should be cautious.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
434 c1428 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top