UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Monday, 3 October 2011, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Earl Howe (Conservative) on Monday, 3 October 2011.

Question

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Darzi of Denham on 9 March 2009 (WA 204–05), from what point is an entity created by nuclear transfer considered to beeither a human embryo or an admixed embryo subject to regulation according to Sections 1(1)(a) and 4A(6)(a) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (as amended); whether the viability of embryos created by nuclear transfer is a prerequisite to their definition as embryos under the Act, and if so, how this is established; and what criteria the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority applies when assessing whether an entity is an embryo subject to regulation.

Answer

The meaning of an embryo is set out in Section 1(1) and a human admixed embryo in Section 4A(6) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, as amended. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has advised that it has nothing further to add, by way of interpretation, to the definitions contained in the Act or to the Written Answer provided by Lord Darzi of Denham on 9 March 2009, Official Report, column WA 204-05.

Type
Written question
Reference
11769; 730 c103-4WA
Session
2010-12
Embryology
Monday, 9 March 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Notes
Answer received between Thursday 15 September and Monday 26 September 2011.
Back to top