UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Monday, 7 February 2011, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Earl Howe (Conservative) on Monday, 7 February 2011.

Question

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what consideration was given by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority’s licence committee members or any of its peer reviewers to the experience of physicians at the University of Minnesota since 1984 in requiring immunosuppression for multiple transplants from non-diabetic identical twin donors to their diabetic twin counterparts before concluding that cloning offered a means of avoiding ““the likelihood of rejection of the transplanted cells””; and what assessment the Authority had made of epigenetic defects associated with somatic cell nuclear transfer, both generally and in relation to its latter critique of iPS cells.

Answer

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has advised that it has nothing to add to the Written Answer given to the noble Lord on 16 December 2010 (Official Report, cols. WA 210-11) by Baroness Wilcox and my Written Answer of 24 January 2011 (Official Report, cols. WA 96-97).

Type
Written question
Reference
6294; 725 c11WA
Session
2010-12
Embryology
Thursday, 16 December 2010
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Monday, 24 January 2011
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top