UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Monday, 24 January 2011, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Earl Howe (Conservative) on Monday, 24 January 2011.

Question

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answers by Earl Howe on 9 December (WA 76–7) and 20 December (WA 247), why Dr Christine Mary O’Toole’s name had been deliberately obscured in the copy of the minutes that were placed in the Library of the House pertaining to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) Research Licence Committee Meeting on 16 March 2005; whether her name and those of other personnel were already masked when the minutes for this meeting were originally published on the HFEA website; whether any of the personnel whose identity has latterly been withheld continues to be employed by the HFEA; and what are the HFEA’s reasons for withholding the identity of its current or former full-time employees but not those of other attendees at a meeting of the Authority.

Answer

In determining whether to make public the name of an official, it is the convention that staff below senior civil service or equivalent level and those whose names are not already within the public domain are not released. As an independent statutory body, these are matters for the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority itself to determine. I have nothing further to add on this matter.

Type
Written question
Reference
5608; 724 c96WA
Session
2010-12
Embryology
Thursday, 9 December 2010
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Monday, 20 December 2010
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top