UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Monday, 27 September 2010, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Earl Howe (Conservative) on Monday, 27 September 2010.

Question

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 19 July (WA 162), what is the evidence to suggest that the proposed treatment is feasible; and how that relates to the Written Answer by Baroness Thornton on 6 April (WA 406) or the statement in the initial application for research licence R0152 that no further animal work is needed.

Answer

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority’s (HFEA) research licence committee makes its decisions based on the merit of each individual application, taking all evidence provided into account. The HFEA has advised that it does not comment on the feasibility of proposed treatments. The HFEA has advised that its research licence committee decided in considering the initial application for research licence R0152 that the research is ““necessary or desirable”” as required by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.

Type
Written question
Reference
1728; 720 c406-7WA
Session
2010-12
Health: Diabetes
Tuesday, 6 April 2010
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Monday, 19 July 2010
Written questions
House of Lords
Notes
Answer received between Thursday 29 July and Monday 2 August 2010.
Back to top