UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Monday, 2 November 2009, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Baroness Thornton (Labour) on Monday, 2 November 2009.

Question

To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 26 June 2007 (WA 129-30), what consideration the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has given to findings reported in the journal Nature on 17 September 2009 (volume 461, issue 7262, pages 367-372) with regard to the renewal of research licence R0153; and, in particular, how the HFEA has evaluated comments by Peter Aldhous in New Scientist on 26 August 2009 indicating that the approach described in the paper is superior to a technique pursued at Newcastle University.

Answer

We understand that any research licence application or renewal considered by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) is assessed in light of the scientific evidence available at the time. When the licence is originally granted, and upon renewal, the application is peer reviewed. The HFEA expects such peer review to consider relevant research.

Type
Written question
Reference
5764; 714 c7WA
Session
2008-09
Embryology
Tuesday, 10 November 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top