UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Tuesday, 23 June 2009, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour) on Tuesday, 23 June 2009.

Question

To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord Darzi of Denham on 9 March (WA 204–5) and 3 June (WA 87–8), how a "live human embryo" is defined in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (as amended); whether that should be interpreted as an embryo that is neither dead nor a member of another species; and, if not, how it has been interpreted by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.

Answer

The department takes the view that the term "live human embryo", as it will appear in subsection 1(1)(a) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (1990 Act) from 1 October 2009, when the amendments made by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 come into effect, would not include dead human embryos or embryos of another species. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority advises that it has nothing to add to the definition set out in subsection 1(1)(a) of the 1990 Act, as amended.

Type
Written question
Reference
4182; 711 c266WA
Session
2008-09
Embryology
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Monday, 9 March 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Tuesday, 7 July 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top