UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Monday, 23 March 2009, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour) on Monday, 23 March 2009.

Question

To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answers by Lord Darzi of Denham on 21 April 2008 (WA 233–34) and 9 March (WA 204–5), why a relationship between extra-embryonic and embryonic tissue is considered by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) to be pivotal to the definition of an embryo grown for more than 14 days when a cloned embryo that lacks the potential to form extra-embryonic tissue is considered as an embryo within the HFEA's regulatory remit.

Answer

I refer the noble Lord to the Answer I gave on 10 February 2009 (WA 176). I have nothing further to add to that Answer.

Type
Written question
Reference
2057; 709 c93WA
Session
2008-09
Embryology
Monday, 21 April 2008
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Tuesday, 10 February 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Monday, 9 March 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Wednesday, 20 May 2009
Written questions
House of Lords

Show all related items (5)
Embryology
Wednesday, 20 May 2009
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top